Incorrect source or offensive?
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous LEAKED: Hearts and Hooves Day | Screw Doors Next »
» See all 46 comments in the herd
Leave a Reply
-
Great Hollerin' Herds!
private614 on Hurricane Spidey Obi-wan Kepony on Unless You Want to Be Con… private614 on I’m Pinkie Pie! I’… Ralph Hunter on Many Manly Tears Were She… private614 on That’s Racist
…ouch
No shipping for Big Mac
Crap… I just posted this exact pic…
Badaboom!
They had buttsecks later
That’s what I call buddysecks.
Friends with benefits, eeyup.
Y U SPOIL!?
lol, spoilers
To the victor belong the spoils.
That was quick…
meme’s before the episode even airs… Come on guys, atleast wait until the episode STARTS on TV to post them.
It spoiled nothing for me, but still it’s only fair to those who actually HAVE willpower
That was my exact thought when i saw this..
FRIEND ZONE’D
Like wise.
Brace yourselves: New episode memes coming earlier than usual.
On roll here folks.
Oh good, I wasn’t the only one who thought that Big mac was friend zoned
Is being good friends with someone really that bad?
I have female friends that I don’t want to sleep with, and we get along great. I also have female friends who wouldn’t want to date me or have dated me and it ended badly, and we’re still good friends.
I want to hug you so much right now.
Unless you had a friend that you fell in love with, you haven’t experienced what the true Friend-Zone is about. OP’s pic is not a good example of the friend-zone at all. They barely know each other and therefore he cannot be friend-zoned.
Why is big mac’s cutie mark so big?
must…not…watch…
“Dun dun dun!” *hawk screech*
I know that feel, bro.
it’s okay because big macintosh would never cheat on caramel anyway
i mean, i haven’t watched the leaked new episode, because it wouldn’t feel right pirating this of all shows,
but i’ve already decided i will probably have to declare it non-canon
You know…they were probably classmates once…
so it makes sense for her to say he’s a good friend.
That’s a possibility but until we see a flashback of that it’s debatable. As far as we know, she is just well acquainted with the Apple family through Apple Bloom.
Er, friendship is in the friggin’ title – EVERYPONY is in the friend zone!
I saw a comment like this on youtube, as well, and I don’t get the usage. Big Macintosh showed no romantic interest in Cheerilee at all until the CMC butted in. How can he be ‘friend zoned’ if all he was to Cheerliee before WAS A FRIEND? He was not asking her out here. He was not about to ask her out, either. Cheerliee knows Mac because his sister is in her class, and as LovelyWillow suggested, was probably in class with her when they were younger; Ponyville isn’t that big, and I’m sure everyone is at least casually acquainted with each other.
I know the ‘friend zoned’ are desperate to vilify any woman who doesn’t immediately lie back and spread ‘em for having a door opened for her, but you’re actively searching out examples where they don’t exist. A grip: get one, please.
There’s seems to a massive misconception of what the Friend-Zone is.
1st) You are right. This is not an example of being Friend-Zoned. They are merely acquaintences through Applebloom. Niether of them have had a chance to even be more than acquaintences (until the end of the episode) and become Close Friends.
2nd) I don’t know where to begin on clarifying what the friend-zone is so if I sound a little chopped up it’s because I’m trying to say 5 things at once. The Friend-zone does not have an immeadiate connection to intercourse. If lust is at all involved, then the friend-zone does not apply because friends don’t NORMALLY sleep with each other (i.e. Friends with Benefits). In that case, it’s just a guy/girl trying to get their whistle wet and should not be confused for people that actually have been friend-zoned. The people in the Friend-zone are people that have a close/best friend that they have gotten to know in a deep, meaningful way and have ended up falling in love with them for who they are. When the other party doesn’t return those same feelings, THAT’S when they get Friend-Zoned. NO ONE….in the Friend-zone will EVER vilify the person they love. If they do, they were never in love….they were never their friend….it was always about lust. And more often times than not, the reason for the unreturned feelings are not justifiable (meaning they are only skin-deep.) No matter how you look at it, the Friend-zone is not a place ANYBODY wants to be in. Because one person will have their heart-broken and the other will have lost a friend. If that hasn’t happened to you, then you cannot claim to have been friend-zoned.
There’s seems to a massive misconception of what the Friend-Zone is.
1st) You are right. This is not an example of being Friend-Zoned. They are merely acquaintences through Applebloom. Niether of them have had a chance to even be more than acquaintences (until the end of the episode) and become Close Friends.
2nd) I don’t know where to begin on clarifying what the friend-zone is so if I sound a little chopped up it’s because I’m trying to say 5 things at once….and I this website seems to keep filtering what I want to say so I’ll will try to say it paragraph by paragraph.
The Friend-zone does not have an immeadiate connection to intercourse. If lust is at all involved, then the friend-zone does not apply because friends don’t NORMALLY sleep with each other (i.e. Friends with Benefits). In that case, it’s just a guy/girl trying to get their whistle wet and should not be confused for people that actually have been friend-zoned.
The Friend-zone does not have an immeadiate connection to “relations”. If lust is at all involved, then the friend-zone does not apply because friends don’t NORMALLY sleep with each other (i.e. Friends with Benefits). In that case, it’s just a guy/girl trying to get their whistle wet and should not be confused for people that actually have been friend-zoned.
The Friend-zone does not have an immeadiate connection to intercourse. If lu5t is at all involved, then the friend-zone does not apply because friends don’t NORMALLY sleep with each other (i.e. Friends with Benefits).
It’s a f*cking childrens show. Remember that. No lu5t will be presented at all.
(Lust?! I can’t say lust!?! WTF Memebase!)
It took you 27 minutes to notice that?
It t0ok you 27 minutes to notice that?
I’m doing other things as well, get off my case. And I know it’s a children’s show I was addressing someone’s misguided view on what the Friend-Zone is but this gawddamn website is filtering something in what I’m saying.
I’m doing other things as well, get off my case. And I know it’s a children’s show. I was addressing a commentor’s misguided view on what the Friend-zone is not what the post is about. I’m trying to give an explanation but for some reason I keep getting auto-flagged by something I am saying.
oh ffs…..I’ve been replying to you for the past 30 minutes trying to explain something but this website…..is censoring me!!!
You know what…I don’t think i’m being auto-censored. This page is going to explode with duped comments tommorrow….I am so sorry everyone ….
Told you…..oh why oh, can’t there be a delete button?
In that case, it’s just a guy/girl trying to get their whistle wet and should not be confused for people that actually have been friend-zoned. The people in the Friend-zone are people that have a close/best friend that they have gotten to know in a deep, meaningful way and have ended up falling in love with them for who they are. When the other party doesn’t return those same feelings, THAT’S when they get Friend-Zoned. NO ONE….in the Friend-zone will EVER vilify the person they love. If they do, they were never in love….they were never their friend….it was always about lust. And more often times than not, the reason for the unreturned feelings are not justifiable (meaning they are only skin-deep.) No matter how you look at it, the Friend-zone is not a place ANYBODY wants to be in. Because one person will have their heart-broken and the other will have lost a friend. If that hasn’t happened to you, then you cannot claim to have been friend-zoned.
In that case, it’s just a guy/girl trying to get their whistle wet and should not be confused for people that actually have been friend-zoned. The people in the Friend-zone are people that have a close/best friend that they have gotten to know in a deep, meaningful way and have ended up falling in love with them for who they are. When the other party doesn’t return those same feelings, THAT’S when they get Friend-Zoned. NO ONE….in the Friend-zone will EVER vilify the person they love. If they do, they were never in love….they were never their friend….it was always about lu5t. And more often times than not, the reason for the unreturned feelings are not justifiable (meaning they are only skin-deep.) No matter how you look at it, the Friend-zone is not a place ANYBODY wants to be in. Because one person will have their heart-broken and the other will have lost a friend. If that hasn’t happened to you, then you cannot claim to have been friend-zoned.
In that case, it’s just a guy/girl trying to get their whistle wet and should not be confused for people that actually have been friend-zoned. The people in the Friend-zone are people that have a close/best friend that they have gotten to know in a deep, meaningful way and have ended up falling in love with them for who they are. When the other party doesn’t return those same feelings, THAT’S when they get Friend-Zoned.